1 Reply to Commentaries
نویسنده
چکیده
The primary goal of Evolutionary Phonology is to explain recurrent sound patterns in spoken languages across time and space. One domain of explanation is diachronic, and much of my own work has focused on diachronic explanations (e.g. Blevins 2004, 2006a, To appear a, To appear b, To appear c, this volume). Another domain of explanation is synchronic. A range of synchronic factors, from the mechanics of speech perception and production (e.g. Myers and Hansen 2005, To appear), to aspects of languages use (e.g. Blevins 2005a, 2005b), to general cognitive strategies in learning, categorization, and pattern-matching (e.g. Wedel 2004, 2005, To appear a, To appear b), are likely to play a major role in defining recurrent aspects of sound patterns.
منابع مشابه
How Practitioners Can Use Evidence-based Forecasting: Reply to Commentaries
The commentaries reinforce my belief that research evidence alone is not sufficient for organizations to consider new methods. I suggest procedures to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based findings. Comments Postprint version. Published in Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, Volume 5, 2006, pages 14-15. This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: ht...
متن کاملToward a theory of verbal behavior.
This paper is a reply to an accompanying set of six commentaries by Sidman; Hayes and Barnes; Schusterman, Kastak, and Reichmuth; Tonneau and Sokolowski; Lowenkron; and Moerk. Those commentaries were prompted by our article ‘‘On the Origins of Naming and Other Symbolic Behavior’’ (1996), which was, in turn, followed by 26 commentaries and a reply. In the course of the present reply, we further ...
متن کاملREPLY Marriage at the Summit: Response to the Commentaries
This article serves as a response to the 13 commentaries on the target article, which introduced the suffocation model of marriage in America. This reply has four main sections. First, it presents an elaborated version of the suffocation model that was inspired by the commentaries. Second, it addresses three areas of significant disagreement that emerged as we digested the commentaries. Third, ...
متن کاملThe Contents of Consciousness: Reply to Hellie, Peacocke, and Siegel
I would like to thank Benj Hellie, Chris Peacocke, and Susanna Siegel for their very interesting commentaries on The Character of Consciousness. All of them focus mainly on issues from the second half of the book, especially issues concerning the contents of consciousness. Hellie focuses especially on the role of acquaintance and perceptual attention in perception and introspection and on the o...
متن کاملGenetic Epidemiology 11:463-472 (1994) Direction of Causation: Reply to Commentaries
We reply to the commentaries on the lead papers by Neale et al. [1994a] and Duffy and Martin [1994]. Topics covered include power calculations, cross-sectional measurement vs. lifetime reports, the appropriateness of the direction of causation (DOC) model, extensions to study causation between the latent variables, sampling of subjects, and heterogeneity. We consider the potential of combining ...
متن کاملThe centrality of expressive indices ∗
Without exception, the commentaries on my paper help further develop and refine the theory of expressives. They approach the expressive dimension from diverse theoretical perspectives, and they leave us with important new data. There is not space in this reply to do justice to all the points raised, so I instead highlight and reexamine the main themes. This reply is structured around expressive...
متن کامل